Regulation, answered by design.
TPB draft AI guidance: TPB(I) D62/2026Using AI never reduces or transfers your responsibility. The registered practitioner stays fully accountable for the accuracy and quality of every service, and confidentiality obligations follow client data into any AI tool.
How AccuMate answers it
- Three named practitioner sign-off gates: nothing reaches a client or the ATO without your approval
- Client consent captured at onboarding before their data enters the platform
- A full audit trail of every AI action, reviewable at any time
How AccuMate answers it
- Honest interim path: lodgements flow through Xero, an established DSP
- Direct-lodgement certification sits on our compliance roadmap below, not claimed before it is earned
How AccuMate answers it
- Australian data residency, hosted in Azure Australia East
- Per-practice tenant isolation: your clients’ data is never visible to another firm
- We never train general AI models on your client data
APES 110 Code of EthicsIndependence, confidentiality, and professional competence sit with the member. They cannot be delegated to software.
How AccuMate answers it
- Practitioner-in-the-loop by design: AI drafts, a registered practitioner approves
- White-labelled under your firm’s brand, so your client relationship stays yours
- Per-practice tenancy and role-based access inside the practice
TPB(I) D62/2026 is an exposure draft (consultation closed April 2026). We track it as it is finalised and will keep this page current.